3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Robert Paul Dols v. Andrew M. Saul.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Robert Paul Dols v. Andrew M. Saul Anchor | green | “if, after reviewing the record, the court finds it is possible to draw two inconsistent positions from the evidence and one of those positions represents the alj's findings, the court must affirm the alj's decision.” | 9 |
| 2 | Kathy Swedberg v. Andrew Saul | green | “to take into account medical limitations, including opinions as to work time limits, and offer an opinion on the ultimate question whether a claimant is capable of gainful employment.” | 6 |
| 3 | Espanola Masterson v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security | green | “the alj determines a claimant's rfc based on all relevant evidence, including medical records, observations of treating physicians and others, and the claimant's own descriptions of his or her limitations.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.