5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Odilon Garcia.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Odilon Garcia Anchor | green | “aiding and abetting is embedded in every federal indictment for a substantive crime.” | 7 |
| 2 | Hernandez v. State | green | “the fact that the government prescribed different penalties in two separate statutes for the same conduct” | 3 |
| 3 | Randolph v. State | green | “aiding and abetting is embedded in every federal indictment for a substantive crime.” | 3 |
| 4 | Sharma v. State | green | “nevada law does not distinguish between an aider or abettor to a crime and an actual perpetrator of a crime.” | 3 |
| 5 | Sheriff, Pershing County v. Andrews | green | “institution or a facility of the department of corrections” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.