4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Coleman v. Commonwealth.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coleman v. Commonwealth Anchor | green | “the object of the endangerment can be the driver himself, the police officer, or anyone else on the road that could be put at risk from the driver's eluding.” | 7 |
| 2 | Coleman v. Commonwealth | green | “that the exposure to danger does not result in any actual harm is a welcome fortuity, but not a legal defense.” | 5 |
| 3 | Coleman v. Commonwealth | green | “to 'endanger' is to 'expose to danger, harm, or loss.” | 5 |
| 4 | Tucker v. Commonwealth | green | “conduct that raises the specter of endangerment” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.