2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Midwest Media Property, L.L.C v. Symmes Township.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Midwest Media Property, L.L.C v. Symmes Township Anchor | green | “would have the effect of establishing or refuting one of the essential elements of a cause of action or defense asserted by the parties.” | 11 |
| 2 | Martin v. Toledo Cardiology Consultants, Inc. | green | “the 'mere possibility' of a factual dispute is not enough.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.