6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Munson v. Del Taco, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Munson v. Del Taco, Inc. Anchor | green | “comity and federalism counsel that the california supreme court, rather than this court, should answer” | 4 |
| 2 | Turner v. Association of American Medical Colleges | green | “has always drawn meaning from a growing body of legislation intended to reduce or eliminate the physical impediments to participation of physically handicapped persons in community life” | 3 |
| 3 | Turner v. Association of American Medical Colleges | green | “may also be construed as requiring equal physical access to a nontangible location such as an internet site.” | 3 |
| 4 | National Federation of the Blind v. Target Corp. | green | “the dpa reaches target.com as a kind of business establishment and an accommodation, advantage, facility, and privilege of a place of public accommodation.” | 3 |
| 5 | Wallace v. McCubbin | green | “we have discretion to decide the second step anti-slapp issue ourselves, since it is subject to independent review.” | 3 |
| 6 | Cullen v. Netflix, Inc. | green | “plaintiff may be able to pursue his discrimination claims if they are asserted as independent claims separate from an ada violation because both the unruh act and the dpa apply to websites.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.