3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Schaffer Ex Rel. Schaffer v. Weast.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Schaffer Ex Rel. Schaffer v. Weast Anchor | green | “each iep must include an assessment of the child's current educational performance, must articulate measurable educational goals, and must specify the nature of the special services that the school will provide.” | 12 |
| 2 | Mark H. Ex Rel. Michelle H. v. Lemahieu | green | “while the idea focuses on the provision of appropriate public education to disabled children, the rehabilitation act of 1973 more broadly addresses the provision of state services to disabled individuals.” | 4 |
| 3 | Mark H. Ex Rel. Michelle H. v. Lemahieu | green | “provide a free appropriate public education to each qualified handicapped person” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.