3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bullins v. Schmidt.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bullins v. Schmidt Anchor | green | “wanton conduct done with conscious or reckless disregard for the rights and safety of others.” | 16 |
| 2 | Young v. Woodall | green | “the standard of care intended by the general assembly involves the reckless disregard of the safety of others, which is gross negligence.” | 2 |
| 3 | Young v. Woodall | green | “it seems clear to us that the standard of care intended by the general assembly involves the reckless disregard of the safety of others, which is gross negligence.” | 1 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.