4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Marilyn H.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Marilyn H Anchor | green | “once reunification services are ordered terminated, the focus shifts to the needs of the child for permanency and stability.” | 10 |
| 2 | Miller v. Superior Court | green | “reasonable notice and opportunity to be heard were given to all affected persons.” | 3 |
| 3 | In Re Andrea G. | green | “in determining whether placement with a relative is appropriate” | 3 |
| 4 | Plas v. Superior Court | green | “the act contemplates that where there is concurrent jurisdiction, only one state should exercise jurisdiction.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.