Topic: determination was within the bounds of reasonableness. · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #21768

6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cities of Abilene v. PUBLIC UTILITY COM'N OF TEXAS.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Cities of Abilene v. PUBLIC UTILITY COM'N OF TEXAS Anchor
texapp · 2004
green “determination was within the bounds of reasonableness.” 5
2 CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC v. Gulf Coast Coalition of Cities
texapp · 2008
green “after the deregulation process was completed, the power-generation and retail electric markets would be subject to the 'normal forces of competition' and 'customer choices,' but the transmission-and-distribution utilities would remain regulated by the commission.” 3
3 Kaufman v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline
texapp · 2006
green “a timely request, objection, or motion” 3
4 Fibreboard Corp. v. Pool
texapp · 1991
green “is applicable only when the exhibit is prepared by public officials or employees under their supervision in the performance of their official duties,” 3
5 Nucor Steel v. PUBLIC UTILITY COM'N OF TEX.
texapp · 2005
green “bears the burden of overcoming a presumption that the commission's findings are supported by substantial evidence.” 3
6 Public Utility Commission v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
texapp · 1997
green “power to accept and act upon an agreement between the parties that removes from dispute and litigation a subsidiary issue of fact or law” 2

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check