4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Talbott v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Talbott v. State Anchor | green | “did not correctly assess every relevant factor entering into his decision.” | 6 |
| 2 | Mitschke v. State | green | “a trial court is not required to admonish a defendant about every possible consequence of his plea, direct or collateral, only about those direct consequences that are punitive in nature or specifically enunciated in the law.” | 5 |
| 3 | Mitschke v. State | green | “punitive in nature or specifically enunciated in the law.” | 5 |
| 4 | Mitschke v. State | green | “if the consequence is definite and largely or completely automatic, then it is a direct consequence.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.