2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Firstmerit Bank, N.A..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Firstmerit Bank, N.A. Anchor | green | “given the parties' general commercial background and the commercial needs of the particular trade or case, the clause involved is so one-sided that it is unconscionable under the circumstances existing when the parties made the contract.” | 16 |
| 2 | Hazelwood v. Mandrell Industries Co., Ltd. | green | “tipped so that the employee's benefits under the statute are substantially reduced, and the clear intent of the legislature is thwarted.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.