4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 134 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Roberts v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Roberts v. State Anchor | green | “is not one of the established procedures for challenging the validity of a judgment in a criminal case” | 63 |
| 2 | Lacey v. State | green | “it has been held many times that a motion to set aside a judgment is inappropriate in a criminal case.” | 10 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.