4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hiatt v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hiatt v. State Anchor | green | “child victims of sexual crimes are afforded great latitude when testifying and they are not expected to testify with the same clarity and ability as is expected of a mature and capable adult.” | 6 |
| 2 | Hiatt v. State | green | “not expected to testify with the same clarity and ability as is expected of a mature and capable adult.” | 5 |
| 3 | White v. State | green | “prevents corroboration, contradiction, and the influencing of witnesses.” | 4 |
| 4 | Russell v. State | green | “question in assessing the harm of allowing peavy to remain in the courtroom is whether she was influenced in her testimony by the testimony she heard.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.