4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from McGowen v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McGowen v. State Anchor | green | “when the testifying witness is a court-accepted expert in the relevant field who participated in the analysis in some capacity, such as by performing procedural checks, then the testifying witness's testimony does not violate a defendant's sixth amendment rights.” | 8 |
| 2 | McGowen v. State | green | “actively involved in the production” | 4 |
| 3 | McGowen v. State | green | “actively involved in the production of the report and had intimate knowledge of the analyses even though she did not perform the tests first hand.” | 4 |
| 4 | Conners v. State | green | “someone other than the primary analyst who conducted the test can testify regarding the results.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.