6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Arteaga v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arteaga v. State Anchor | green | “prohibited from marrying or purporting to marry” | 4 |
| 2 | Volosen v. State | green | “but in interpreting a prior law, we generally accord little weight to subsequent legislative enactments.” | 3 |
| 3 | Volosen v. State | green | “in interpreting a prior law, we generally accord little weight to subsequent legislative enactments” | 3 |
| 4 | Rito Gregory Lopez, Jr. v. State | green | “facts constituting one of the six bigamy prohibitions listed in section 25.01” | 3 |
| 5 | Estes v. State | green | “marital perception of trustworthiness” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.