3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re LA.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re LA Anchor | green | “in a juvenile proceeding, the hearing judge sits as the finder of fact.” | 9 |
| 2 | In Re LA | green | “the weight to be assigned the testimony of the witnesses is within the exclusive province of the fact finder.” | 5 |
| 3 | Commonwealth v. Kline | green | “neither the ability to carry out the threat nor a belief by the person threatened that it will be carried out is an essential element of the crime.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.