8 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 133 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Molinos Valle Del Cibao, C. Por A. v. Lama.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Molinos Valle Del Cibao, C. Por A. v. Lama Anchor | green | “domicile is not synonymous with residence; one may temporarily reside in one location, yet retain domicile in a previous residence.” | 29 |
| 2 | Taylor v. Appleton | green | “empowered to hear only those cases within the judicial power of the united states as defined by article iii of the constitution or otherwise authorized by congress.” | 29 |
| 3 | Taylor v. Appleton | green | “citizenship, not residence, is the key fact that must be alleged . . . to establish diversity for a natural person.” | 25 |
| 4 | Travaglio v. American Express Co. | green | “no plaintiff is a citizen of the same state as any defendant.” | 15 |
| 5 | Shannon Leonard v. Enterprise Rent A Car | green | “the burden of establishing subject matter jurisdiction falls on the party invoking removal.” | 13 |
| 6 | Sylvia Crist vs Carnival Corporation | green | “domicile is not synonymous with residence; one may temporarily reside in one location, yet retain domicile in a previous residence.” | 13 |
| 7 | Lost Mountain Homeowners v. J. Andrew Rice | green | “originally filed in a state court to the federal district court when the district court has original jurisdiction to consider the case.” | 5 |
| 8 | Lost Mountain Homeowners v. J. Andrew Rice | green | “original jurisdiction requires diversity of the parties or the existence of a federal question.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.