5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hoffman v. Lehnhausen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hoffman v. Lehnhausen Anchor | green | “we are aware of no authority under which the process of tax collection and distribution could have been interrupted to divert from the governmental bodies that had levied the taxes an amount fixed by the court as fees for the attorneys for the plaintiffs.” | 5 |
| 2 | People ex rel. Schad, Diamond and Shedden, P.C. v. My Pillow, Inc. | green | “nothing is to be read into such statutes by intendment or implication.” | 5 |
| 3 | Klaine v. Southern Illinois Hospital Services | green | “against the offending unit of government.” | 3 |
| 4 | Thomann v. The Department of State Police | green | “only where the claimant is a prevailing party on a discrimination claim against a governmental body involving one or more of the identified suspect classes.” | 3 |
| 5 | Carmichael v. Laborers' & Retirement Board Employees' Annuity & Benefit Fund of Chicago | green | “all annuities, refunds, pensions, and disability benefits granted under this article shall be exempt from attachment or garnishment process and shall not be seized, taken, subjected to, detained, or levied upon by virtue of any judgment, or any process or proceeding whatsoever i…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.