4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Green v. Morgan Properties.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Green v. Morgan Properties Anchor | green | “our inquiry is limited to examining the legal sufficiency of the facts alleged on the face of the complaint.” | 7 |
| 2 | Velantzas v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. | green | “search the complaint in depth and with liberality to ascertain whether the fundament of a cause of action may be gleaned even from an obscure statement of claim” | 5 |
| 3 | State, Dept. of Treasury v. Qwest Communications International, Inc. | green | “a plaintiff is entitled to a liberal interpretation and given the benefit of all favorable inferences that reasonably may be drawn.” | 4 |
| 4 | Scheidt v. DRS Technologies, Inc. | green | “the essential facts supporting the cause of action must be presented in order for the claim to survive,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.