6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bergstein v. Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bergstein v. Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP Anchor | green | “used that information 'in devising the legal strategy to be employed' in the litigation against plaintiffs.” | 4 |
| 2 | Simmons v. Allstate Insurance | green | “in making its determination, the court shall consider the pleadings” | 3 |
| 3 | Berg & Berg Enterprises, LLC v. Sherwood Partners, Inc. | green | “defendant had knowledge of and agreed to both the objective and the course of action that resulted in the injury” | 3 |
| 4 | Choate v. County of Orange | green | “to prove a claim for civil conspiracy, contreras was required to provide substantial evidence of three elements: (1) the formation and operation of the conspiracy, (2) wrongful conduct in furtherance of the conspiracy, and (3) damages arising from the wrongful conduct.” | 3 |
| 5 | Kimmel v. Goland | green | “although farnell was not present during the actual recording of the conversations, he transcribed the tapes and 'furthered the unlawful agreement to record the confidential conversations by aiding, abetting, counseling, advising and encouraging' plaintiffs in their recording of …” | 3 |
| 6 | Bergstein v. Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP | green | “centered in defendants' role as counsel” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.