4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Johnson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Johnson Anchor | green | “counsel may have made a tactical decision not to request such an instruction to avoid unduly emphasizing the other-crimes evidence.” | 4 |
| 2 | United States v. Pierre Dawson and Alphonso Ingram | green | “as a device for enforcing nonconstitutional rules," exclusion is "disfavored” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Brown | green | “now i don't know why isn't here. is he afraid to take the stand? is he afraid to tell the truth? will the truth hurt the defendant? i don't know.” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Lopez | green | “intent, motive, or absence of mistake” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.