6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 134 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Nolan v. Nolan.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nolan v. Nolan Anchor | green | “the decision of a reviewing court in a case remains the law of that case on the legal questions involved for all subsequent proceedings in the case at both the trial and reviewing levels.” | 79 |
| 2 | Nolan v. Nolan | green | “provides that the decision of a reviewing court in a case remains the law of that case on the legal questions involved for all subsequent proceedings in the case at both the trial and reviewing levels.” | 38 |
| 3 | City of Hubbard ex rel. Creed v. Sauline | green | “which were fully pursued, or available to be pursued, in a first appeal.” | 6 |
| 4 | Gohman v. City of St. Bernard | green | “provides that the decision of a reviewing court in a case remains the law of that case on the legal questions involved for all subsequent proceedings in the case at both the trial and reviewing levels.” | 4 |
| 5 | State ex rel. Potain v. Mathews | green | “is necessary to ensure consistency of results in a case, to avoid endless litigation by settling the issues, and to preserve the structure of superior and inferior courts as designed by the ohio constitution.” | 4 |
| 6 | City of Hubbard ex rel. Creed v. Sauline | green | “precludes a litigant from attempting to rely on arguments at a retrial which were fully pursued, or available to be pursued, in a first appeal.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.