4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Las Vegas Convention & Visitors Authority v. Miller.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Las Vegas Convention & Visitors Authority v. Miller Anchor | green | “we will affirm the district court if it reaches the right result, even when it does so for the wrong reason.” | 7 |
| 2 | Callie v. Bowling | green | “must do so in an independent action against the alleged alter ego with the requisite notice, service of process, and other attributes of due process” | 4 |
| 3 | Herup v. First Boston Financial, LLC | green | “three types of transfers may be set aside under the ufta: (1) actual fraudulent transfers; (2) constructive fraudulent transfers; and (3) certain transfers by insolvent debtors.” | 4 |
| 4 | Howard Hughes Medical Institute v. Gavin | green | “eneither mere conjecture nor hope of proving the allegations of a pleading is sufficient to create a factual issue” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.