5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Moran.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Moran Anchor | green | “as a rule, failure to object to a probation condition in the trial court on standard state law or reasonableness grounds forfeits the claim for appeal.” | 7 |
| 2 | People v. Rios | green | “a minor cannot be made subject to an automatic search condition; instead, such condition must be tailored to fit the circumstances of the case and the minor.” | 4 |
| 3 | People v. Tien Duc Nguyen | green | “disclose your true identity, including residence address and telephone number, in any advertisement, notice, or offer to sale and/or purchase on the internet.” | 4 |
| 4 | People v. Garcia | green | “a state may validly insist on answers to even incriminating questions and hence sensibly administer its probation system, as long as it recognizes that the required answers may not be used in a criminal proceeding and thus eliminates the threat of incrimination.” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Robles | green | “as our decisions indicate, searches that are undertaken pursuant to a probationer's advance consent must be reasonably related to the purposes of probation.” | 1 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.