3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gersh Zavodnik v. Irene Harper.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gersh Zavodnik v. Irene Harper Anchor | green | “a pro se litigant is held to the same standards as a trained attorney and is afforded no inherent leniency simply by virtue of being self-represented.” | 7 |
| 2 | Lloyd G. Perry v. Anonymous Physican 1, Alias Medical Group 1, Inc., Anonymous Physican 2 | green | “an appellant who proceeds pro se is held to the same established rules of procedure that trained legal counsel is bound to follow and, therefore, must be prepared to accept the consequences of his or her action.” | 7 |
| 3 | Gersh Zavodnik v. Irene Harper | green | “is held to the same standards as a trained attorney and is afforded no inherent leniency simply by virtue of being self-represented.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.