6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Pena.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Pena Anchor | green | “so unworthy of belief as to be incredible as a matter of law” | 4 |
| 2 | People v. Pena | green | “nothing in the record suggests that the victim was 'so unworthy of belief as to be incredible as a matter of law' or otherwise tends to establish defendant's innocence of those crimes . . . , and thus it cannot be said that the jury failed to give the evidence the weight it shou…” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Roman | green | “a different verdict would not have been unreasonable inasmuch as this case rests largely on the jury's credibility findings with respect to the testimony of the victim” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Roman | green | “several aspects of the victim's testimony were corroborated by other witnesses,” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Shinebarger | green | “so inconsistent or unbelievable as to render it incredible as a matter of law” | 3 |
| 6 | People v. Woolson | green | “delayed, conflicted, or unconvincing disclosure” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.