6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State ex rel. Jennings v. Industrial Commission.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State ex rel. Jennings v. Industrial Commission Anchor | green | “where a medical expert has, by deposition testimony, repudiated a conclusion previously made in a medical report, that report cannot constitute evidence to support the order of the commission.” | 4 |
| 2 | State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc. | green | “it is the commission which determines the weight and credibility to be given to the medical reports admitted into evidence.” | 3 |
| 3 | State ex rel. Miller v. Industrial Commission | neutral | “should be evaluated for rehabilitation in a field of work involving no exposure to petroleum products or other toxic chemicals.” | 3 |
| 4 | State ex rel. Copeland Corp. v. Industrial Commission | neutral | “comments are susceptible to differing interpretations.” | 3 |
| 5 | State ex rel. Copeland Corp. v. Industrial Commission | neutral | “susceptible to differing interpretations.” | 3 |
| 6 | State ex rel. Pavis v. General Motors Corp. | green | “where a key question is left unanswered, the commission is entitled to conclude that the medical report's persuasiveness is either diminished or negated.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.