5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Luis Dutton Myrie v. Attorney General United State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Luis Dutton Myrie v. Attorney General United State Anchor | green | “the ij to address two questions: '(1) what is likely to happen if the petitioner is removed; and (2) does what is likely to happen amount to the legal definition of torture?” | 5 |
| 2 | Kaplun v. Attorney General of the United States | green | “it is more likely than not that he or she would be tortured if removed to the proposed country of removal.” | 4 |
| 3 | Mendoza-Ordonez v. Attorney General of the United States | green | “an obvious, plain, gross, significant, or manifest error or miscalculation.” | 3 |
| 4 | Abduvakhob Alimbaev v. Attorney General United States | green | “standard plainly does not entitle a reviewing court to reverse the finding of the trier of fact simply because it is convinced that it would have decided the case differently.” | 3 |
| 5 | Nelson Quinteros v. Attorney General United States | green | “may not ignore evidence favorable to the alien.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.