5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Fleetwood v. Harford Systems Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fleetwood v. Harford Systems Inc. Anchor | green | “a party that obstructs or delays the interactive process, or simply fails to communicate, is not acting in good faith to find a solution.” | 5 |
| 2 | Fleetwood v. Harford Systems Inc. | green | “cannot escape liability simply because the employee does not suggest a particular reasonable accommodation that would assist him.” | 4 |
| 3 | United States v. King | green | “a wish for accommodation of her disability.” | 3 |
| 4 | Haneke v. Mid-Atlantic Capital Management | green | “implicit in the fourth element of the prima facie case is the ada requirement that the employer and employee engage in an interactive process to identify a reasonable accommodation” | 3 |
| 5 | Fleetwood v. Harford Systems Inc. | green | “cannot prevail simply by demonstrating that his employer failed to engage in the interactive process; he must also show that this failure to engage in the process resulted in the failure to find an appropriate accommodation.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.