3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from SportFuel, Inc. v. PepsiCo, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SportFuel, Inc. v. PepsiCo, Inc. Anchor | green | “allows individuals to use otherwise trademarked language in a descriptive sense.” | 9 |
| 2 | KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. Lasting Impression I, Inc. | green | “cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive.” | 5 |
| 3 | KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. Lasting Impression I, Inc. | green | “holder of a registered mark ... has a civil action against anyone employ- ing an imitation of it in commerce when 'such use is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.