4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Javery v. Lucent Technologies, Inc. Long Term Disability Plan for Management or LBA Employees.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Javery v. Lucent Technologies, Inc. Long Term Disability Plan for Management or LBA Employees Anchor | green | “file reviews are questionable as a basis for identifying whether an individual is disabled by mental illness.” | 8 |
| 2 | Holmstrom v. Metropolitan Life Insurance | green | “the plan administrator is entitled to seek and consider new information and, in appropriate cases, to change its mind.” | 4 |
| 3 | Janet M. Schneider v. Sentry Group Long Term Disability Plan, Sentry Group Supplemental Disability Insurance Plan, and Sentry Life Insurance Company | green | “where the plan administrator terminated benefits to which the administrator had previously determined the claimant was entitled.” | 3 |
| 4 | Mote v. Aetna Life Insurance | green | “the plan administrator is entitled to seek and consider new information and, in appropriate cases, to change its mind.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.