6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from SBC Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SBC Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission Anchor | green | “a statement of the terms and conditions that the boc generally offers to provide such access and interconnection,” | 3 |
| 2 | Marie v. Edgar | green | “such relief as it determines is appropriate” | 3 |
| 3 | Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. Public Service Com'n of Wisconsin | green | “when the federal government amends or enacts a law making a state subject to suit merely by continuing in existing activities to protect its citizens.” | 3 |
| 4 | Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin | green | “is an 'otherwise permissible activity' that can yield no inference as to a state's motivation for doing it.” | 3 |
| 5 | Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin | green | “one must acknowledge the conceptual difference between a state official performing state functions in a way that violates federal law and a state official who is performing federally authorized functions but is alleged to have performed those functions improperly.” | 3 |
| 6 | Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin | green | “some apparent constructive waivers,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.