4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Dan Glickman, Secretary of Agriculture.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Dan Glickman, Secretary of Agriculture Anchor | green | “for each claim, if constitutional and prudential standing can be shown for at least one plaintiff, we need not consider the standing of the other plaintiffs to raise that claim.” | 6 |
| 2 | Mova Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Shalala | green | “who in practice can be expected to police the interests that the statute protects.” | 5 |
| 3 | Mova Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Shalala | green | “not on those who congress intended to benefit, but on those who in practice can be expected to police the interests that the statute protects.” | 4 |
| 4 | Mova Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Shalala | green | “in practice can be expected to police the interests that the statute protects.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.