4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jean-Pierre v. Federal Bureau of Prisons.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jean-Pierre v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Anchor | green | “although foia cases 'typically and appropriately are decided on motions for summary judgment,' where an agency argues that the requester has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies, courts analyze the matter under rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim.” | 7 |
| 2 | Colbert, Venita v. Potter, John E. | green | “on the grounds that the plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before seeking judicial review” | 5 |
| 3 | Manuel v. Potter | green | “in addition, the non-moving party cannot rely upon inadmissible evidence to survive summary judgment; rather, the non-moving party must rely on evidence that would arguably be admissible at trial.” | 3 |
| 4 | Rosenberg v. United States Department of Immigration and Customs Enforcement | green | “failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before seeking judicial review.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.