4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Dutil v. Murphy.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dutil v. Murphy Anchor | green | “are solicitous of the obstacles that pro se litigants face, and while such litigants are not exempt from procedural rules, we hold pro se pleadings to less demanding standards than those drafted by lawyers and endeavor, within reasonable limits, to guard against the loss of pro …” | 6 |
| 2 | Eagle Eye Fishing Corporation v. United States Department of Commerce | green | “thus, the court will consider a pro se movant's circumstances when reviewing his motion for summary judgment but will not provide 'extra procedural swaddling.” | 5 |
| 3 | Dutil v. Murphy | green | “we hold pro se pleadings to less demanding standards than those drafted by lawyers and endeavor, within reasonable limits, to guard against the loss of pro se claims due to technical defects.” | 4 |
| 4 | Dutil v. Murphy | green | “hold pro se pleadings to less demanding standards than those drafted by lawyers and endeavor, within reasonable limits, to guard against the loss of pro se claims due to technical defects.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.