2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hancock v. Astrue.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hancock v. Astrue Anchor | green | “in reviewing for substantial evidence, not undertake to reweigh conflicting evidence, make credibility determinations, or substitute our judgment for that of the alj.” | 9 |
| 2 | Lisa Dunn v. Carolyn Colvin | green | “an alj's determination as to the weight to be assigned to a medical opinion generally will not be disturbed absent some indication that the alj has dredged up 'specious inconsistencies,' or has failed to give a sufficient reason for the weight afforded a particular opinion.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.