6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gus Hall v. Edwin J. Simcox.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gus Hall v. Edwin J. Simcox Anchor | green | “granted, numbers aren't everything.” | 3 |
| 2 | Libertarian Party Of Illinois v. Rednour | green | “need only determine whether illinois has important interests that sufficiently justify the burden on plaintiffs' rights.” | 3 |
| 3 | Ralph Nader v. John Keith | green | “restrictions on candidacy must ... be considered together rather than separately,” | 3 |
| 4 | Phyllis Griffin v. Elaine Roupas | green | “the length of time it takes to cover distance depends on road and traffic conditions that vary dramatically across the state.” | 3 |
| 5 | Anthony Navarro v. Langdon Neal | green | “if courts were to require that government defendants marshal evidence to prove actual voter confusion, such a requirement would 'necessitate that a state's political system sustain some level of damage before the legislature could take correct action.” | 3 |
| 6 | Raza Unida Party v. Bullock | green | “a compelling interest to insure that participants in one party's nominating process do not participate in another's.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.