2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Richard Kennedy v. Carolyn W. Colvin.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Richard Kennedy v. Carolyn W. Colvin Anchor | green | “if it is supported by substantial evidence and if the commissioner applied the correct legal standards.” | 10 |
| 2 | Donna J. SWENSON, Widow of Herman J. Swenson, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Defendant-Appellee | green | “however, if a claimant establishes an inability to continue her past work, the burden shifts to the commissioner in step five to show that the claimant can perform other substantial gainful work.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.