3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Achterhof v. Selvaggio.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Achterhof v. Selvaggio Anchor | green | “unless it can be established beyond a doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” | 7 |
| 2 | Samantha Sistrunk v. City of Strongsville and Bush-Quayle '92 Committee, Inc. | green | “construe the complaint liberally in the plaintiffs favor and accept as true all factual allegations and permissible inferences therein.” | 6 |
| 3 | Andrews v. State of Ohio | green | “in practice, a ... complaint must contain either direct or inferential allegations respecting all the material elements to sustain a recovery under some viable legal theory.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.