2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bushansky v. Remy International, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bushansky v. Remy International, Inc. Anchor | green | “additionally, plaintiffs have not presented any evidence or case law establishing that the inclusion of historical fees in similar situations is material.” | 7 |
| 2 | Jorge Alcarez v. Akorn, Inc. | green | “the district court must make the required findings whether or not a litigant asks.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.