5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Travelers Insurance Companies v. Penda Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Travelers Insurance Companies v. Penda Corporation Anchor | green | “illinois cases do not consider who owned the property in question when determining if a claim is within policy coverage.” | 4 |
| 2 | Pekin Insurance v. Janes & Addems Chevrolet, Inc. | green | “the property damage covered under completed operations coverage was expressly defined in the policy to include only property damage which 'occurs during the policy period.” | 4 |
| 3 | Seegers Grain Co. v. Kansas City Millwright Co. | green | “the property damage covered under completed operations coverage was expressly defined in the policy to include only property damage which 'occurs during the policy period.” | 4 |
| 4 | Zurich Insurance Co. v. Raymark Industries, Inc. | green | “found nothing in the policy language that permits proration.” | 3 |
| 5 | Great Amer. Ins. Co. v. TINLEY PK. REC. COMM. | green | “which constituted the only relevant occurrence, and the court concluded that an” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.