Topic: precise formulation' for an abuse of discretion. · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #22573

6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. David R. Knapp, United States of America v. Grk Corporation, Dba Knapp Ford Mercury.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 United States v. David R. Knapp, United States of America v. Grk Corporation, Dba Knapp Ford Mercury Anchor
ca9 · 1997
green “precise formulation' for an abuse of discretion.” 3
2 United States v. Darrell H. Lack
ca7 · 1997
green “important limitation on the government's use of the mail fraud statute,” 3
3 United States v. George C. Hook
ca7 · 1999
green “is a valid extension of congressional power” 3
4 United States v. George C. Hook
ca7 · 1999
green “regulate and protect the instrumentalities of interstate commerce, or persons or things in interstate commerce, even though the threat may come only from intrastate activities,” 3
5 United States v. Chung Lo
ca9 · 2000
green “need not be an essential element of the scheme, just a 'step in the plot,” 3
6 United States v. Frances Roxanne Franks
ca7 · 2002
green “which made it easy for a customer's bank to reverse the credit if the instrument cannot be collected.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check