6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Litzler v. Cc Investments.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Litzler v. Cc Investments Anchor | green | “a claim that affects long-settled transactions might hang forever over honest persons.” | 3 |
| 2 | Andrew J. Orkin F. Mark Orkin Sarah-Rose Josepha Adler A. Heinrich Zille v. Elizabeth Taylor | green | “approximate state law as closely as possible in order to make sure that the vindication of the state right is without discrimination because of the federal forum.” | 3 |
| 3 | Roth v. Reyes | green | “supports the goals of disclosure and transparency” | 3 |
| 4 | Dreiling v. America Online Inc. | green | “congress enacted section 16(b) as part of the exchange act to prevent corporate insiders from exploiting their access to information not generally available to others.” | 3 |
| 5 | Levine v. Smith | green | “the board has better access to the relevant facts” | 3 |
| 6 | In Re Section 16 (B) Litigation | green | “the company's ipo underwriters, in addition to certain of its officers, directors and principal shareholders, as identified in the ipo prospectus.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.