6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from City of Redding v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | City of Redding v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Anchor | green | “alliant did not once mention the fpa, let alone 206.” | 3 |
| 2 | City of Redding v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission | green | “city of redding expressly rejected plaintiffs' and ferc's argument that ferc's section 206 powers were analogous to ferc's power to change provisional rates filed under section 205.” | 3 |
| 3 | Firstenergy Service Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission | green | “the statutory 'just and reasonable' standard is the same under section 205 and section 206.” | 3 |
| 4 | Public Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission | green | “permits ferc to correct prices under the px and iso tariffs, because the cal-px and cal-iso are 'public utilities' under the fpa.” | 3 |
| 5 | Public Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission | green | “under the express language of 206, however, ferc may not order refunds for any period prior to the filing of the complaint.” | 3 |
| 6 | Alli v. United States | green | “breached its present contractual duty to pay the refunds they owe, and they have breached that duty by nonpayment.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.