6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Wayne Stephens.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Wayne Stephens Anchor | green | “in considering 'all relevant circumstances,' courts may consider distinctions such as a venireperson's attorney status in de- termining whether the inference of discrimination is demon- strated.” | 3 |
| 2 | Bynum v. Lemmon | green | “unreasonable appli- cation of clearly established federal law” | 3 |
| 3 | Bennett v. Gaetz | green | “in batson, the supreme court established a three-step framework for determining whether a prosecutor violated a defendant's equal protection rights by exercising peremp- tory challenges in a racially discriminatory manner.” | 3 |
| 4 | Bennett v. Gaetz | green | “the burden at this stage is light.” | 3 |
| 5 | Franklin v. Sims | green | “circumstances raising a sus- picion that discrimination occurred.” | 3 |
| 6 | Franklin v. Sims | green | “relevant only insofar as the strikes are so clearly attributable to that apparent, non- discriminatory reason that there is no longer any suspicion, or inference, of discrimination.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.