6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from San Pedro Neighborhood Assoc. v. Board of County Commissioners of Santa Fe County.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | San Pedro Neighborhood Assoc. v. Board of County Commissioners of Santa Fe County Anchor | green | “we will conduct the same review of an administrative order as the district court sitting in its appellate capacity, while at the same time determining whether the district court erred in the first appeal.” | 3 |
| 2 | Zerbe v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review | green | “clearly, our legislature has decided that it is the designation which is controlling as to whether a government employee is eligible for unemployment compensation benefits upon loss of employment” | 3 |
| 3 | Conroy v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review | green | “designated as a . . . major . . . advisory position” | 3 |
| 4 | Conroy v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review | green | “it must, at a minimum, be a written statement of policy which has the clear and intended effect of establishing the . . . employment status attached to the position.” | 3 |
| 5 | Odato v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review | green | “it is not necessary that the designation contain the precise words 'major' or 'policymaking' or 'advisory,' although it can be done that way.” | 3 |
| 6 | Gahres v. Commonwealth | green | “not covered employment for the purposes of unemployment compensation.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.