6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Zapata.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Zapata Anchor | green | “a party may not complain on appeal of an error that 14 he has invited or injected into the case; he must abide by t he consequences of his acts.” | 3 |
| 2 | Nah v. Sls | green | “section 19-4-105 does not indicate that the presumption of legitimacy automatically outweighs the presumption of biology, or that the converse is true.” | 3 |
| 3 | People Ex Rel. Jcs | green | “if the record supports a factual finding, we are bound by it under the clear error test.” | 3 |
| 4 | in Interest of M.B | green | “if the record supports a factual finding, we are bound by it under the clear error test.” | 3 |
| 5 | In re the Parental Responsibilities of A.R.L. | green | “making a parentage determination is the child's best interests and not the rights of, or the fairnes s to, each of the presumptive parents.” | 3 |
| 6 | Cory Wolven v. Jeanmadi del Rosario Velez | green | “to preserve a contention, a party does not hav e to cite a specific statute, but it must at least raise the issue to the t rial court, so that the court has an opportunity to rule on it .” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.