4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Carteret Savings Bank, F.A. v. Shushan.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carteret Savings Bank, F.A. v. Shushan Anchor | green | “recapitulation of the cases and arguments considered by the court before rendering its original decision fails to carry the moving party's burden.” | 6 |
| 2 | Panna v. Firstrust Savings Bank | green | “must show more than a disagreement with the court's decision.” | 5 |
| 3 | Florham Park Chevron, Inc. v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. | green | “does not contemplate a court looking to matters which were not originally presented.” | 4 |
| 4 | New York Guardian Mortgagee Corp. v. Cleland | green | “might reasonably have altered the result reached....” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.