6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Birkett.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Birkett Anchor | green | “for purposes of this section, 'victim' shall include the immediate surviving family of the actual victim.” | 3 |
| 2 | In Re Estate of Earley | green | “designed to do one thing-to ensure that the courts could order statutory restitution to any person who received assistance from the restitution fund, thereby paving the way for the fund to recoup these amounts directly from the convicted offender.” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Fulton | green | “made an express policy determination that noneconomic damages are not recoverable as restitution,” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Mearns | green | “established a new constitutional right for crime victims to obtain restitution for losses suffered as a result of a criminal act.” | 3 |
| 5 | PROFESSIONAL ENG'RS IN CAL. GOV. v. Kempton | green | “voters are presumed to have been aware of existing laws at the time the initiative was enacted” | 3 |
| 6 | People v. Lee | green | “noneconomic losses, including, but not limited to, psychological harm, for felony violations of sections 288” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.