4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Guenther.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Guenther Anchor | green | “here, testimony that the liquid was dirty and scuffed and had several tracks running through it was, in our opinion, adequate to impute constructive notice of the hazardous condition to the store manager.” | 6 |
| 2 | Woods v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. | green | “testimony of dirt, scuffing, or tracks in a substance generates sufficient inferences of constructive notice.” | 5 |
| 3 | Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Guenther | green | “testimony that the liquid was dirty and scuffed and had several tracks running through it was, in our opinion, adequate to impute constructive notice of the hazardous condition to the store manager.” | 4 |
| 4 | Erickson v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. | green | “we conclude that the source of the puddle (i.e. ceiling leak) as well as the size of the puddle were sufficient to create a jury question as to whether this hazardous condition existed for a sufficient period of time to charge appellee with constructive notice and to invite corr…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.